🎉 Hey Gate Square friends! Non-stop perks and endless excitement—our hottest posting reward events are ongoing now! The more you post, the more you win. Don’t miss your exclusive goodies! 🚀
1️⃣ #TokenOfLove# | Festival Ticket Giveaway
Cheer for your idol on Gate Square! Pick your favorite star — HyunA, SUECO, DJ KAKA, or CLICK#15 — and post with SingerName + TokenOfLove hashtag to win one of 20 music festival tickets.
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/post/status/13217654
2️⃣ #GateTravelSharingAmbassadors# | Share Your Journey, Win Rewards
Gate Travel is now live! Post with the hashtag and sha
Viewpoint: The DOGE department led by Musk may actually be cutting costs far below 10 billion dollars.
Yesterday, Musk tweeted, "As my time as a special government employee comes to an end, I want to thank President Trump for giving me this opportunity to cut wasteful spending. The mission of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life for the whole of government." Advisory committees like DOGE do not have the power to cut federal spending, close agencies, or cancel contracts, their recommendations are implemented by the president or appointed officials, and most cost-cutting measures require congressional legislation, according to the analysis. This means that Trump should have pushed for legislation to legitimize DOGE reforms, but he didn't, and the House of Representatives' recently passed budget approved only $9.3 billion in institutional cuts, less than 5% of Musk's original $2 trillion annual throttling target. "DOGE thunders and rains," said Jessica Riedl, a budget analyst at the Manhattan Institute, "and the actual throttling is probably well below $10 billion." The political reality has exposed the essence of DOGE, which may be a superficial cost-cutting show, and the "stubbornness" of the federal budget has not been touched in the slightest. Members of Congress have a firm grip on the various institutions of the executive branch, and even Republicans are reluctant to allow "vigilantes" like Musk to interfere with their turf. (Golden Ten)